- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:42:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6541
Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsDrafting |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-03-16 13:42:36 ---
During its 2009-03-13 telecon, the schema WG adopted a proposal to address this
issue.
The proposal can be found at (member-only):
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.omni.20090313.html
Changes include:
1. In bullet 2.2.8 of "3.13.6.2 XPath Valid", removed the special treatment for
Type Alternative, and added a note indicating that the Assertions and Type
Alternatives have special requirements for "function signatures".
2. Updated "3.13.6.1 Assertion Properties Correct" for "function signatures"
requirements, as suggested in comment #3.
With these changes, the WG believes that the issue raised in this bug report is
fully addressed. I'm marking this RESOLVED accordingly.
Michael, as the persons who opened and reopened this issue, if you would
indicate your concurrence with or dissent from the WG's disposition of the
comment by closing or reopening the issue, we'll be grateful. If we don't hear
from you in the next two weeks, we'll assume that silence implies consent.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 13:42:46 UTC