- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:22:20 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6541 --- Comment #1 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-02-09 16:22:20 --- > (a) all the constructor functions for > built in types plus (b) all the functions defined in the F+O namespace for > XPath 2.0. Trying to understand the proposal. Is this the same as "everything required by XPath 2.0"? If not, what's left out? If yes, is there a shorter way of saying "everything" than "(a) + (b)"? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 16:22:32 UTC