- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:49:16 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6541 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-02-09 16:49:16 --- XPath 2.0 leaves it to the host language to define which functions are supported; it merely provides a repertoire to choose from: (a) functions in the fn namespace in F+O (b) constructors for built-in types (c) constructors for user-defined types (d) functions defined by the host language spec e.g. XSLT or XForms (e) user-defined functions written in XQuery or XSLT (f) functions defined and provided by the implementor (g) extension/external user-written functions written e.g. in Java or C# I don't think there is a simple way of saying that the minimum for XML Schema is (a)+(b). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 16:49:26 UTC