- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:51:17 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522 Summary: Please un-deprecate the the namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC URL: http://relaxng.org/xsd-20010907.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: cowan@ccil.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com The XSD 1.1 Part 2 draft of 2009-01-30 claims: "The definition of a namespace separate from the main namespace defined by this specification proved not to be necessary or helpful in facilitating the use, by other specifications, of the datatypes defined here." On the contrary, this namespace is heavily used by authors of RELAX NG schemas who wish to make use of the XSD2 datatypes. (RELAX NG allows fully user-specified primitive and derived datatypes, and the forthcoming DTLL language will provide a method for declaratively specifying them.) In fact, this namespace is built in to the RELAX NG compact syntax: for schemas written in that syntax, the mapping of the namespace prefix "xsd" (not "xs") to this namespace is presumed by the RELAX NG processor. I can't speak to the further claim "[the use of this namespace] raises a number of difficult unsolved practical questions", as I don't know what those questions might be. I would have no objection, however, to deprecating the use of this namespace in XML Schemas. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 23:51:26 UTC