- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:42:02 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522
Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeni@jenitennison.com
--- Comment #4 from Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> 2009-02-04 08:42:02 ---
FWIW, I think it should define (a) -- the abstract notion of the datatypes
themselves rather than the simple type definitions. This enables other datatype
definition languages (such as DTLL) to use them without implying a particular
method of definition.
I suppose it *could* form a basis for distinguishing between
{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}decimal and
{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes}decimal if the first was the simple
type definition and the second the datatype itself, but I don't know if that
would work.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 08:42:11 UTC