- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:51:27 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522 --- Comment #15 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-02-06 15:51:27 --- So, given all of that, I propose that the WG take the following actions: 1) undeprecate the use of the namespace 2) add explanatory text (based on Michael's 'a'), i.e. "they denote the datatypes, but not the simple type definitions" 3) add a further comment that gives the following sort of information "this namespace is provided to make it easy for other specifications to reference the datatypes. Note that will inevitably be some magic in that referencing. Such magic is defined by them, and not by the XML Schema WG." Obviously we won't say "magic" but that's the idea. So it won't be deprecated, but it will be clearly stated that we're not going to try to define exactly what it means, either. And we stop just short of saying that trying to define it is beyond our ability. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 15:51:36 UTC