www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from October to December 2006 by author

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)

Daniel Veillard

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)

david.k.vun.kannon@us.pwc.com

• Re: traversal attributes are NMTOKEN instead of NCNAME in the XML Schema (Tuesday, 24 October)

fugu13@mac.com

• Delivery reports about your e-mail (Wednesday, 29 November)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Monday, 2 October)

Michael Kay

• RE: Comments on new XML Base draft (Friday, 8 December)
• RE: Comments on new XML Base draft (Saturday, 18 November)
• [XML Base] Comments on new XML Base draft (Monday, 13 November)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Implementation report test collection (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: traversal attributes are NMTOKEN instead of NCNAME in the XML Schema (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Non-normative status of schema - negative consequences for interoperability (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: XPointer to redefined elements (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Nested simple, onRequest links and traversal failure (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: XLink 1.1: behaviour of simple links without a show attribute (Monday, 23 October)

Richard Tobin

• Re: Comments on new XML Base draft (Friday, 8 December)
• Re: Comments on new XML Base draft (Thursday, 16 November)

Last message date: Friday, 8 December 2006 16:47:27 UTC