- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:59:46 -0400
- To: david.k.vun.kannon@us.pwc.com
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, Walter Hamscher <walter@hamscher.com>, hughwallis@XBRL.ORG
- Message-ID: <87zmblvjx9.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Apologies for the long delay in replying. / david.k.vun.kannon@us.pwc.com was heard to say: | The non-normative XML Schema for XLink 1.1 mistakenly uses NMTOKEN as the | restriction base for the types for the traversal attributes label, from, and to. | These should be based on NCNAME, as stated in the text of the specification, | section 5.7 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/#traversal-atts). | If you refer back to the XBRL schemas that were provided earlier in the 1.1 | process, you can confirm that they use NCNAME, not NMTOKEN. Fixed, thank you. | Speaking as a private individual (not for the XBRL consortium or my company) I | believe that XBRL is the largest use of XLink in the world. The chief avenues of | extensibility provided by XBRL are new schemas, new XLink roles and arc roles, | and new XLink linkbases. The XBRL consortium of more than 400 organizations | worldwide has recently opened a Link Role Registry to support reuse and | interoperability of roles and arc roles. It would be appropriate if the donation | of the XML Schemas for XLink, which first appeared in XBRL 2.0 (2001) was noted | in the 1.1 document. I added the following note to the end of the appendix that contains the schema: <p>Note: The Working Group acknowledges the work of the <a href="http://www.xbrl.org/">XBRL Consortium</a> in producing a W3C XML Schema for XLink 1.0, which was useful input into the design of the schema document for XLink 1.1.</p> Please let us know if this response is satisfactory. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 15:00:34 UTC