www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from July to September 2006 by thread

xml-stylesheet base resource identifier Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 21 September)

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier Daniel Veillard (Thursday, 21 September)
  • Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 21 September)
    • Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier Daniel Veillard (Friday, 22 September)
      • Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 30 September)

XPointer considered incomprehensible Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 1 September)

• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 1 September)
  • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 3 September)
    • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Henry S. Thompson (Monday, 4 September)
      • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 4 September)
• RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible Jonathan Marsh (Monday, 4 September)
  • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 5 September)
    • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 5 September)
      • RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible Jonathan Marsh (Tuesday, 5 September)
        • fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 5 September)
          • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Tuesday, 5 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 5 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 5 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 6 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 6 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 6 September)
            • RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 6 September)
            • Re: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) Dan Brickley (Wednesday, 6 September)
        • Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 5 September)

Re: XLink conformance criteria question Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 23 August)

• Re: XLink conformance criteria question Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 23 August)

No response to conformance question since April Boris Zbarsky (Saturday, 22 July)

• Re: No response to conformance question since April Henry S. Thompson (Wednesday, 26 July)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2006 13:07:13 UTC