www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from July to September 2006 by author

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Thursday, 21 September)
• xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Sunday, 3 September)
• XPointer considered incomprehensible (Friday, 1 September)

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: XLink conformance criteria question (Wednesday, 23 August)
• No response to conformance question since April (Saturday, 22 July)

Dan Brickley

• Re: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Dan Connolly

• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE:XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointerconsidered incomprehensible) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Daniel Veillard

• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: xml-stylesheet base resource identifier (Thursday, 21 September)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: No response to conformance question since April (Wednesday, 26 July)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Tuesday, 5 September)
• RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Monday, 4 September)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: XPointer considered incomprehensible (Tuesday, 5 September)

Norman Walsh

• Re: XLink conformance criteria question (Wednesday, 23 August)

Simon St.Laurent

• RE: fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• fragment identifiers and media types (was RE: XPointer considered incomprehensible) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2006 13:07:13 UTC