W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms-ws@w3.org > October 2001

RE: Documents & Editors

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:47:49 -0800
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F40586985D@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: "'Mike Just'" <Mike.Just@entrust.com>, "'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie'" <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>, www-xkms-ws@w3c.org
Cc: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@sun.com>
I started on a chained XKMS services doc, I will dig it out. My conclusion
was that it should all work except that there are some important fixes we
need to be made to Soap routing to prevent deadlock and livelock. These
really need to be in SOAP since they affect all chained web services.
 
        Phill
 
 

Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
pbaker@verisign.com
781 245 6996 x227


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Just [mailto:Mike.Just@entrust.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:36 PM
To: 'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie'; www-xkms-ws@w3c.org
Cc: Shivaram Mysore
Subject: RE: Documents & Editors



Hi Stephen, 

From a look at the working group scope that was prepared as part of the
proposal, there was also a requirement to "[p]roduce non-normative
document(s) that set ou best practices for applying XKMS to applications
that may include (i) chained XKMS services (including the n-corners model)
and (ii) interoperation with existing X.509 and PGP based applications." In
the working group proposal, this item came between 2 and 3 (as enumerated
below) and was actually prioritized ahead of 3.  It appears there is a
mandate for work to begin on this task as well, assuming there are
volunteers?

I agree that the requirements doc is the first priority though. 

Mike 


> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Stephen Farrell [ mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
<mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie> ] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:12 PM 
> To: www-xkms-ws@w3c.org 
> Cc: Shivaram Mysore; xme 
> Subject: Documents & Editors 
> 
> 
> 
> Folks, 
> 
> At the moment I reckon we should be working on our first 
> three deliverables, with volunteer editors (thanks to 
> them) as listed below: 
> 
> 1. requirements (Mike Just, Frederick Hirsch) 
> 2. xkms (Phill Hallam-Baker) 
> 3. xbulk (Merlin Hughes) 
> 
> Versions of 2 & 3 are available now, so you can review those 
> and send your comments to the list as you get the chance, and 
> the editors can start in on new versions as they get the 
> chance. 
> 
> However, for now, I'd like us to focus on the requirements 
> document, with the aim of having a (proabably *very* rough) 
> list of requirements when we get together on the phone in 
> a couple of weeks and having a version of the document for 
> review at the f2f in December. (More on those dates 
> tomorrow, btw). 
> 
> So, I'd encourage you to start sending requirements text 
> to the list. 
> 
> Meanwhile Shivaram and I are going to get a proto-WG web 
> site setup somewhere. (Might be next week before that's 
> up & running.) 
> 
> Regards, 
> Stephen. 
> 
> Links to the existing documents: 
> 
> xkms:  http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms/>  
> xbulk: http://www.baltimore.com/devzone/x-bulk/x-bulk.zip
<http://www.baltimore.com/devzone/x-bulk/x-bulk.zip>  
>        (sorry about the format:-) 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________________ 
> Stephen Farrell                                          
> Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 
> 39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000 
> Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
<mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>  
> Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com
<http://www.baltimore.com>  
> 


Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 15:53:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:07:33 UTC