- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:37:08 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'www-xenc-xmlp-tf'" <www-xenc-xmlp-tf@w3.org>
On Thursday 04 April 2002 01:36, David Orchard wrote: > 1. What namespace(s) would we use? SOAP-SEC uses xmlsoap.org, and I > assume we'd have to switch to w3.org. I can get us something like: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/soap-sec > 2. What names for specs? WS-Sec? WS-Security (and another number of > interesting names) are taken by MSFT. Don't know. I'm happy with Christopher's suggestion. > 3. Do you see taking specs and modifying them, with new editors from our > task force? Don't know. My point is there is no reason for people to have process paralysis. I can get the authors a namespace, and this forum is suitable for such conversation. If someone wants a web services security activity, with a charter, requirements last call, and the guarentees and coordination of process, then one needs a chartered activity But that shouldn't stop people from banging around a document on the technical side here -- given that this work must be compatible with the IPR terms of the xenc and xmlp WGs if its to be used by those activities (or some new form thereof). > 4. I think that MSFT has updated/changed from SOAP-SEC to WS-Security, so > it would be worthwhile knowing the reasons. In particular, I'd like to > know if there was new or updated thinking. > 5. I think that we should get a small list of requirements as well. > Might make it easier for WSArch to take any output. > 6. Is this a public list? Yes. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xenc-xmlp-tf/
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 11:37:14 UTC