RE: Suggested removal of 2 assertions

Tom,

As the working group explained it to me, the text that identifies this 
requirement will remain in the spec so that it is easy for a reader to 
understand the WSDL 2.0 requirements. The assertion ID will be removed as 
per the working group's policy that assertions highlight WSDL 2.0 
requirements that are not enforced by schema validation.

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com



"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
11/28/2006 11:24 AM

To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Suggested removal of 2 assertions






Isn?t it reasonable to include assertions explicitly even though they may 
be enforced by Schema validation?
 
Doesn?t this make it easier for a user of the spec to understand the 
requirements?
 
--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe ColdFusion Team

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:44 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Suggested removal of 2 assertions
 

I'd like to request that the following 2 assertions be removed from the 
WSDL 2.0 spec. as they are all handled by the WSDL 2.0 schema and schema 
validation. 

Endpoint-0065 

For each Endpoint component in the endpoints property of a Service 
component, the name property MUST be unique.


InterfaceFault-0032 

For each Interface Fault component in the interface faults property of an 
Interface component, the name property must be unique.


Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com