- From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:24:47 -0800
- To: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 16:25:55 UTC
Isn't it reasonable to include assertions explicitly even though they may be enforced by Schema validation? Doesn't this make it easier for a user of the spec to understand the requirements? -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:44 AM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Suggested removal of 2 assertions I'd like to request that the following 2 assertions be removed from the WSDL 2.0 spec. as they are all handled by the WSDL 2.0 schema and schema validation. Endpoint-0065 For each Endpoint component in the endpoints property of a Service component, the name property MUST be unique. InterfaceFault-0032 For each Interface Fault component in the interface faults property of an Interface component, the name property must be unique. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 16:25:55 UTC