RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

Got it.  I added similar to the wsdl 1.1 EIs but collapsing all the soap
binding element descriptions into 1 section.
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifi
ers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
 
Cheers,
Dave


________________________________

	From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] 
	Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:06 PM
	To: David Orchard
	Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; www-ws-desc;
www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon
	Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
	
	

	Dave, 
	
	We defined an extension syntax and Part 2 defines the extensions
for the new components: 
	
	wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap,
wsoap.module(parent/ref)) 
	wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap,
wsoap.header(parent/element declaration)) 
	wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/http,
whttp.header(parent/name)) 
	
	Arthur Ryman,
	IBM Software Group, Rational Division
	
	blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
	phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
	assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
	fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
	mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 
	
	
	
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

11/24/2006 03:15 PM 

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
cc
"Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>,
<www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

	




	there was a request to show an extension in the wsdl 1.1 eis,
and I realized that I don't think that wsdl 2.0 defines designators for
the soap or http bindings, leaving the xpointer scheme for them
undefined.  I guess that means that wsdl 1.1 eis must either make the
same decision or define it's own extra identifiers.   
	  
	Was the reason for leaving off the soap and http identifers one
of 80/20?  Or am I missing something? 
	  
	Cheers, 
	Dave 
	
	
________________________________

	From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] 
	Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:50 AM
	To: David Orchard
	Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; www-ws-desc;
www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon
	Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
	
	
	David, 
	
	So do you think it is useful to also (the extra 1%) specify the
canonical form of the fragids to simplify comparison? 
	
	Arthur Ryman,
	IBM Software Group, Rational Division
	
	blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
	phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
	assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
	fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
	mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 
	
	
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

11/23/2006 09:21 PM 



To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> 
cc
"www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves
Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers


	


	
	
	
	It is eerily familiar because it is 99% a cut and paste from
wsdl 2.0 :-) 
	 
	Dave 
	
	
________________________________

	From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
	Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:43 PM
	To: Philippe Le Hegaret
	Cc: www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon
	Subject: Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
	
	
	[1] looks eerily familiar. 
	
	We added some text on a canomical form. I suggest they do the
same. 
	
	Arthur Ryman,
	IBM Software Group, Rational Division
	
	blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
	phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
	assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
	fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
	mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 
	
Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

11/16/2006 05:33 AM 



To
www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org> 
cc
Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> 
Subject
agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers




	


	
	
	
	
	
	The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a
Working
	Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those
identifiers would
	then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as
WSDL 1.1
	domain expressions.
	
	
	1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document
by the WS
	Policy WG?
	
	2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and
provide
	feedback to the WS Policy WG?
	
	Regards,
	
	Philippe
	
	[1]
	
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifi
ers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
	[2]
	
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAt
tachment