- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:12:56 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFDD87E1F9.B43BCC66-ON85257233.005D3143-85257233.005E926E@ca.ibm.com>
Dave, Makes sense since you dealing with elements, not components. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/24/2006 06:59 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Subject RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Got it. I added similar to the wsdl 1.1 EIs but collapsing all the soap binding element descriptions into 1 section. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 Cheers, Dave From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:06 PM To: David Orchard Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Dave, We defined an extension syntax and Part 2 defines the extensions for the new components: wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap, wsoap.module(parent/ ref)) wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap, wsoap.header(parent/ element declaration)) wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/http, whttp.header(parent/ name)) Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/24/2006 03:15 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Subject RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers there was a request to show an extension in the wsdl 1.1 eis, and I realized that I don't think that wsdl 2.0 defines designators for the soap or http bindings, leaving the xpointer scheme for them undefined. I guess that means that wsdl 1.1 eis must either make the same decision or define it's own extra identifiers. Was the reason for leaving off the soap and http identifers one of 80/20? Or am I missing something? Cheers, Dave From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:50 AM To: David Orchard Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers David, So do you think it is useful to also (the extra 1%) specify the canonical form of the fragids to simplify comparison? Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/23/2006 09:21 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> cc "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Subject RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers It is eerily familiar because it is 99% a cut and paste from wsdl 2.0 :-) Dave From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:43 PM To: Philippe Le Hegaret Cc: www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon Subject: Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1] looks eerily familiar. We added some text on a canomical form. I suggest they do the same. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/16/2006 05:33 AM To www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> Subject agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a Working Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those identifiers would then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as WSDL 1.1 domain expressions. 1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document by the WS Policy WG? 2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and provide feedback to the WS Policy WG? Regards, Philippe [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAttachment
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 17:13:10 UTC