RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

Dave,

We defined an extension syntax and Part 2 defines the extensions for the 
new components:

wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap, wsoap.module(parent/
ref))
wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/soap, wsoap.header(parent/
element declaration)) 
wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/http, whttp.header(parent/
name)) 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
11/24/2006 03:15 PM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
"Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, 
<www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Subject
RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers






there was a request to show an extension in the wsdl 1.1 eis, and I 
realized that I don't think that wsdl 2.0 defines designators for the soap 
or http bindings, leaving the xpointer scheme for them undefined.  I guess 
that means that wsdl 1.1 eis must either make the same decision or define 
it's own extra identifiers. 
 
Was the reason for leaving off the soap and http identifers one of 80/20? 
Or am I missing something?
 
Cheers,
Dave

From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:50 AM
To: David Orchard
Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves 
Lafon
Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers


David, 

So do you think it is useful to also (the extra 1%) specify the canonical 
form of the fragids to simplify comparison? 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 


"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
11/23/2006 09:21 PM 


To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> 
cc
"www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves 
Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers








It is eerily familiar because it is 99% a cut and paste from wsdl 2.0 :-) 
  
Dave 

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:43 PM
To: Philippe Le Hegaret
Cc: www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon
Subject: Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers


[1] looks eerily familiar. 

We added some text on a canomical form. I suggest they do the same. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 

Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
11/16/2006 05:33 AM 


To
www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org> 
cc
Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> 
Subject
agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers











The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a Working
Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those identifiers would
then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as WSDL 1.1
domain expressions.


1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document by the WS
Policy WG?

2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and provide
feedback to the WS Policy WG?

Regards,

Philippe

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8

[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAttachment