RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

So we are agreed. We will look at the Note, but we cannot compel them to
change it.

Tony Rogers
tony.rogers@ca.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, 17 November 2006 11:35
To: Rogers, Tony
Cc: www-ws-desc
Subject: RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 10:33 +1100, Rogers, Tony wrote:
> Personally, I'd be interested in reviewing the Note, and I doubt I'm 
> the only one. I'm even willing to offer any proofreading notes that 
> occur to me during the review.
> 
> However, following the letter of the charter, I believe this WG is 
> only responsible for WSDL 2.0, not 1.1, so I doubt we could object; or

> have I misunderstood that, Philippe?

And the WS Policy WG isn't responsible for WSDL 1.1. However, WSDL 1.1
has a lot more to do with WSDL 2.0 than WS-Policy 1.5, so I'm interested
in hearing the opinion of the Group at the minimum.

Philippe

Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 02:29:01 UTC