Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

+1

Rogers, Tony wrote:
> Personally, I'd be interested in reviewing the Note, and I doubt I'm the
> only one. I'm even willing to offer any proofreading notes that occur to
> me during the review.
>
> However, following the letter of the charter, I believe this WG is only
> responsible for WSDL 2.0, not 1.1, so I doubt we could object; or have I
> misunderstood that, Philippe?
>
> Tony Rogers
> tony.rogers@ca.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret
> Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006 21:34
> To: www-ws-desc
> Cc: Yves Lafon
> Subject: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
>
>
> The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a Working
> Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those identifiers would
> then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as WSDL 1.1
> domain expressions.
>
>
> 1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document by the WS
> Policy WG?
>
> 2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and provide
> feedback to the WS Policy WG?
>
> Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifi
> ers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAt
> tachment
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 16:59:56 UTC