Proposal for LC303 (was: What are the exemptions for use of IRI? )

If that's the case, I propose to add the following paragraph to the end
of section 1.3 "Notational Conventions"

	The core specification of WSDL 2.0 supports Internationalized
Resource Identifiers or IRIs [add reference to <>
<> ].  IRIs are a
superset of URIs with added support for internationalization. The URI
syntax [add reference to
<> ] only allows the use of  a small set
of characters, including upper and lower case letters of the English
alphabet, European numerals and a few symbols. IRIs  allow the use of
characters from a wider range of language scripts.  
	For simplification, examples throughout this primer only use
URIs.  If you are interested in the use of IRIs, you might want to read
the paper [add reference to
<> ] prepared by
the W3C Internationalization Activity [add link to <> ]. 

Alternatively, If people are concerned that use of IRI is not really a
"notational convention", we may add a subsection under "Introduction"
for "Use of URI and IRI" with the same content as above. The new
structure of section 1 now looks like
1. Introduction
    1.1 Prerequisites
    1.2 Structure of this Primer
    1.3 Use of URI and IRI
    1.4 Notational Conventions
 2. WSDL 2.0 Basics

Best Regards,



	From: Jonathan Marsh [] 
	Sent: Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 7:50 AM
	To: Liu, Kevin; Hugo Haas
	Subject: RE: What are the exemptions for use of IRI?

	IIRC, the WG was not prepared to do a global search and replace
of URI for IRI in the primer, as URIs are a familiar concept and in
almost all cases in the Primer the term is good enough.  Having one
statement pointing out that our use of URI instead of IRI is a
simplification should be sufficient.  We can confirm this on this week's
call if I've misrepresented the WG's decision.



	From: Liu, Kevin [] 
	Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:25 PM
	To: Hugo Haas; Jonathan Marsh
	Subject: What are the exemptions for use of IRI?


	Hi Hugo, Hi Jonathan,


	While working on proposing changes to the primer to implement
your suggestions in LC303 [1], I realize that we may also need to do a
global search in the Primer to replace the term URI with IRI to be
consistent with the core spec, in addition to adding a brief
introduction to IRI as you suggested.


	However, I  notice that the resolution of LC74a [2] , which
caused the URI to IRI changes in Part 1 and 2,  contains a few
exemptions. The resolution of LC74a says <quote>Change URI to IRI
throughout except URI attr and prop on featiures and properties and SOAP
module, which becomes "ref"; exempt appendix E where we talk about
namespace URIs, and section 4.11.2 in adjunct spec.</quote>.  


	It's not clear to me what the last two exemptions really are
since section "Appendix E" and "section 4.11.2 in adjunct specs" are
completely changed/removed in the current version of the spec. In

		*	If I recall it right, the former Part 1
appendix E is now part of the Primer section 5.6 [3] which talks about
namespace URIs.   Does the exemption for "Appendix E" in LC74a mean that
namespace URI should not be changed to IRI? if so, why? 
		*	I have no idea what the "adjunct section 4.11.2"
was, do you know what  the exemption for "section 4.11.2" is? 



	Best Regards,




[] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
		Sent: Thursday, Sep 08, 2005 10:00 AM
		Subject: Minutes, 8 Sep 2005 WS Description WG telcon



		--  Jonathan Marsh  --
<>   --
<>   --


Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 23:10:07 UTC