- From: Liu, Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:14:52 -0700
- To: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 23:15:04 UTC
Hi Tom, I have sympathy with you, but that should be addressed by the core specification. Here we are trying to address potential inconsistency between the primer and the core spec. Given that the core spec has already adopted IRIs, do you still think that it's OK for the primer to use URIs every where, especially section 5.6? Best Regards, Kevin ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tom Jordahl Sent: Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 8:24 AM To: Jonathan Marsh; Liu, Kevin; www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: RE: What are the exemptions for use of IRI? > Having one statement pointing out that our use of URI instead of IRI is a simplification should be sufficient. Huge +1. I can't tell you how annoyed I am that the term URI (which most people are only barely getting used to) is being replaced by "IRI". Most user unfriendly and we should avoid the term like the plague. And I still don't like these new fangled push-button phones either. Hrrrumph. :-) -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 23:15:04 UTC