What are the exemptions for use of IRI?

Hi Hugo, Hi Jonathan,
 
While working on proposing changes to the primer to implement your
suggestions in LC303 [1], I realize that we may also need to do a global
search in the Primer to replace the term URI with IRI to be consistent
with the core spec, in addition to adding a brief introduction to IRI as
you suggested.
 
However, I  notice that the resolution of LC74a [2] , which caused the
URI to IRI changes in Part 1 and 2,  contains a few exemptions. The
resolution of LC74a says <quote>Change URI to IRI throughout except URI
attr and prop on featiures and properties and SOAP module, which becomes
"ref"; exempt appendix E where we talk about namespace URIs, and section
4.11.2 in adjunct spec.</quote>.  
 
It's not clear to me what the last two exemptions really are since
section "Appendix E" and "section 4.11.2 in adjunct specs" are
completely changed/removed in the current version of the spec. In
particular,

	*	
		If I recall it right, the former Part 1  appendix E is
now part of the Primer section 5.6 [3] which talks about namespace URIs.
Does the exemption for "Appendix E" in LC74a mean that namespace URI
should not be changed to IRI? if so, why?
	*	
		I have no idea what the "adjunct section 4.11.2" was, do
you know what  the exemption for "section 4.11.2" is? 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC303
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC303> 
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74a
[3]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-primer-20050803/#adv-notes-on-uris

Best Regards,
Kevin
  

 


________________________________

	From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
	Sent: Thursday, Sep 08, 2005 10:00 AM
	To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
	Subject: Minutes, 8 Sep 2005 WS Description WG telcon
	
	

	Encl.

	 

	--  Jonathan Marsh  --  jmarsh@microsoft.com
<mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   --
http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/
<http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/>   --

	 

Received on Saturday, 17 September 2005 00:25:27 UTC