- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:24:46 +0600
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:11 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Doesn't this introduce a dependency on the Media Type Description _Note_? > That seems like a procedural problem... Don't we already have that for MTOM/XOP support? IMO it would be lousy to have to skip an elegant solution because of a procedural issue. The media type description note IMO is a critical piece of infrastructure for this stuff; maybe we made a mistake in taking the Note route. Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:25:23 UTC