RE: WSDL RDF mapping editor's draft

I'll try to come up with an ontology for soap messages as well,
does anybody know what's going on in that area?
Is there sth. (a standard) out there to classify soap messages?
regards steffen

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
Sent: Friday, 14 October 2005 1:32 AM
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Description WG
Subject: Re: WSDL RDF mapping editor's draft


Sanjiva, 

the formal specifications of W3C are in HTML, xmlspec is just an
implementation detail from the POV of "our clients". 8-)

Moving to xmlspec is on the todo list, actually, so that references are
easier to handle etc, but I don't believe it's a prerequisite for
publishing the first WD.

Best regards,

Jacek

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 21:24 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Shouldn't these docs be xmlspec'ed before posting them formally?
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 11:28 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > Hi all, 
> > 
> > the WSDL RDF mapping has been updated with the descriptions of
bindings
> > and with the addition of the root Description component.
> > 
> > The editor's drafts are at
> > 
> >
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html
> > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.rdf
> > 
> > Maybe we might add the links to our public homepage. 8-)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Jacek
> > 
> > P.S: I don't plan to send such emails on every update, I just wanted
to
> > make the URIs public. 8-)
> > 
> > 
>

Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 06:47:59 UTC