- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:10:13 -0700
- To: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/jun-f2f.html
[2] TBA
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday 31 May
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Opening formalities
a. Introductions & logistics
b. Assign scribes:
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky
Allen Brookes, Roberto Chinnici, Glen Daniels,
Kevin Canyang Liu, David Orchard
c. Action Item [3] Review:
?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for
the purpose of interoperability testing,
due 2005-05-12.
?* 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
to produce a component/property table via XSLT,
due 2005-05-28.
?* 2005-04-21: Pauld to craft, publish Common Schema structures
to WG for review for publication as WG Note,
due 2005-05-28.
?* 2005-04-22: Amy to provide examples for the advanced section
of the primer. Amy to send them to Kevin and test
materials to Arthur, due 2005-05-19. (LC61c)
?* 2005-05-05: Sanjiva to writeup a proposal for LC71,
due 2005-05-26.
?* 2005-05-12: Glen to add scoping example to primer,
due 2005-06-01.
?* 2005-05-19: Umit to provide #none for Primer, due 2005-06-01.
?* 2005-05-19: DaveO to ressurect option to indicate GET more
directly, due 2005-06-01.
DONE [4] 2005-05-26: Marsh to ask Rich about the worst example for
LC89j, due 2005-05-31.
?* 2005-05-26: Paul to describe LC124 proposal in more detail
(where does the attribute go, what's the value
for normal Schema validation?), due 2005-05-31.
?* 2005-05-26: Glen to put an LC101 proposal on the table,
due 2005-05-31.
?* 2005-05-26: Tom to provide a concrete proposal to address
LC82, due 2005-05-31.
DONE 2005-05-26: Marsh to ask DBooth if the concerns in LC84c
are still valid, due 2005-05-31.
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0087
.html
09:20 Issue LC117: Problem with Service References:
elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction [5]
- Proposal from Umit [6].
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC117
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0062.html
10:30 Break
10:50 Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern [7]
- Awaiting proposal from Sanjiva.
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC71
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Async TF Report
13:30 MEP-related issues:
- LC79: Make sure in-only mep is supported in wsdl soap12
binding [8]
+ Awaiting proposal from Glen/Async TF
- LC101: message level binding? [9]
+ Awaiting proposal from Glen/Async TF
- LC102: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [10]
+ Awaiting proposal from Glen/Async TF
- LC98: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding [11]
- LC114: In-Multi-Out MEP [12]
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC79
[9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC101
[10] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC102
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC98
[12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC114
15:00 Break
15:20 Operation Name Mapping issues
- Review ONMR rewrite as Best Practice [13]
- Issue LC82: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug [14]
+ Proposal from Tom [15]
- Issue LC84b: Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong
granularity [16]
+ Proposals from Hugo [17], Sanjiva 18].
- Issue LC84c: Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far
enough [19]
+ Asked DBooth for more info.
[13]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#Serv
ice_OperationName
[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC82
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0085.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0134.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84bc
17:30 Adjourn
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 1 June
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Issue LC130: Binding fault defaulting? (Jacek) [20]
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0069.html
10:00 Issue LC89j: Use namespaces to avoid local-name conflicts [21]
- More detail from Rich [22], response from Arthur [23]
[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89j
[22]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0088
.html
[23]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0089
.html
10:30 Break
10:50 Issue LC75c: Remove {safety} property [24]
- Options:
1) Status quo
2) Remove safety
3) Proposal from Umit to move safety to an extension [25]
4) Expect GET proposal from DaveO
[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75c
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0059.html
11:30 Issue LC75x: Complete or remove App D [26]
- Some initial options:
Option 0: Close issue with no action
Option 1: Remove app D
Option 2: Retitle and edit to emphasize it's far from exhaustive
Option 3: Strip down to D.4 only.
Option 4: Move to primer (includes option 2)
Option 5: Add exhaustive material.
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75x
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Issue LC74c: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (c) [27]
- Proposal from Amy [28]
[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74c
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0068.html
13:20 Issue LC124: Support of evolution of messages described in Schema
1.0 [29]
- Awaiting proposal from Paul
[29] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC124
14:00 Completed editorial issues [30]
- Proposal to close completed items which may include:
+ LC122: "binding" versus "binding extension" [31]
+ LC131: Notational convention abuse [32]
+ LC132: WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies [33]
[30] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[31] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC122
[32] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC131
[33] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC132
14:30 Proposals addressing formal objections. [34]
- Operation Name Mapping
- F&P: Glen's compromise [35]
[34] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0069.html
15:00 Break
15:20 Unsatisfied comments
- LC5a: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance
issues (a) [36]
Objection [37]
- LC5f: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance
issues (f) [38]
Objection [37]
- LC9: How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement [39]
Unclear whether there is an objection.
- LC51: Editorial last call review comments [40]
Objection [41]
- LC73: Raising an ugly issue again [42]
Objection [43]
- LC75f: Allow extension attributes on RPC local element
children [44]
Objection [45]
- LC75v: Remove "Processor Conformance" [46]
Objection [45]
- LC76a: MEPs should support addressing mechanism [47]
Objection [45]
- LC76c: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Part 2) (c) [48]
Objection [45]
- LC76d: Replace ADD with header construct [49]
Objection [45]
[36] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5a
[37] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5f
[38]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0020
.html
[39] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC9
[40] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC51
[41]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0021
.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC73
[43]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0020
.html
[44] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75f
[45]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0091
.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75v
[47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76a
[48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76c
[49] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76d
16:30 Deliverables status and schedule
Upcoming pubs:
Core (LC2)
Adjuncts (LC2)
Primer (LC)
SOAP 1.1 Binding (LC)
Alternative Schema Languages (WD?)
Other deliverables:
RDF Mapping
Common Schema Structures
16:45 Next FTF
17:00 Adjourn
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 23:10:28 UTC