- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:52:48 -0700
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
> > 10. The numerous "Note"'s about name uniqueness are a big warning > sign > > that something is wrong. XML has the technology to avoid > > local-name conflicts, and the current scheme gives only the > > illusion of independent distributed service development. Proper > > use of namespaces can completely obliterate this problem area. > > Tracked as LC89j [15], the WG has not reached a final disposition of > this comment yet, though we expect one within about a week. > > [15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89j After discussing this for some time, it became apparent there are multiple ways to interpret this comment. For instance, we don't see any improper use of namespaces. Can you elaborate a bit more, and point out what you think the worst example is so we can focus on this issue more directly?
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 15:53:33 UTC