W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2005

RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <39A72E1EBF03EB44AACFD8036D1489F9312151@p02exm01.macromedia.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


I would really prefer this section not to be phrased in terms of a

For instance:
  "How can service providers work around this limitation?"
Change to:
  "How can service providers indicate a relationship between services?"

  "With that caveat in mind, potential workarounds include:"
Change to:
  "With that caveat in mind, potential strategies include:"

In general, this section feels like you are pointing out how lame we
were to not include this feature in the spec.  Rather it should be
presented as we had good reason to limit the wsdl:service to a single
interface and here are some good ideas on how WSDL authors can indicate
related services.

Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> Behalf Of David Booth
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service
> Per my work item:
> [[
> 5. Primer [.1]
>    + Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the
>                  Same Service (David)
> ]]
> I've put a draft of this section into the current editor's draft:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-
> primer.html#adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 20:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:49 UTC