- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:33:15 -0400
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tom Jordahl > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 4:58 PM > To: David Booth; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the > Same Service > > > David, > > I would really prefer this section not to be phrased in terms of a > "limitation". > > For instance: > "How can service providers work around this limitation?" > Change to: > "How can service providers indicate a relationship between > services?" > > And > "With that caveat in mind, potential workarounds include:" > Change to: > "With that caveat in mind, potential strategies include:" > > In general, this section feels like you are pointing out how lame we > were to not include this feature in the spec. Rather it should be > presented as we had good reason to limit the wsdl:service to a single > interface and here are some good ideas on how WSDL authors > can indicate > related services. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On > > Behalf Of David Booth > > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:46 AM > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the > Same Service > > > > > > Per my work item: > > [[ > > 5. Primer [.1] > > + Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the > > Same Service (David) > > ]] > > I've put a draft of this section into the current editor's draft: > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20- > > primer.html#adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service > > > > > > -- > > > > David Booth > > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 21:33:18 UTC