- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:19:21 -0400
- To: <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>, "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Cc: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
So as I understand it, then, using the attribute *is* actually OK to
annotate the schema, and I don't need to change this part. Yes?
--Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM [mailto:Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:13 PM
> To: Asir Vedamuthu
> Cc: Glen Daniels; Amelia A Lewis; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element?
> (was RE: Few more (significant) edits
>
> Asir Vedamuthu wrote:
> > 'ad:mustUnderstand' is an out-of-band attribute. AFAIK,
> this attribute
> > is unreachable (via element declaration component). I raised this
> > issue on June 29th [1]. And, you addressed my concern:
> >
> > [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0281.html
> > [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0285.html
> > [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0285.html
>
> It is reachable. Quoting from [4], section 3.13.2: (the
> uppercase is mine)
>
> Property
>
> {attributes}
>
> Representation
>
> A sequence of attribute information items, namely those
> allowed by the
> attribute wildcard in the type definition for the <annotation> item
> itself OR FOR THE ENCLOSING ITEMS WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE COMPONENT
> WITHIN WHICH THE ANNOTATION COMPONENT IS LOCATED.
>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#cAnnotations
>
> Roberto
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 15:19:49 UTC