W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

RE: Issue 189 proposals:

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:13:15 -0700
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF09332E09@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Where did you read in my proposal that terminating the case of element
not cited meant that elements not cited were serialized outside of the


-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 1:44 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue 189 proposals:

"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes:
> I'm not sure what the point of your email is Sanjiva... 

The point of the email was to lament that this looks awfully
un-user friendly to me. I know its an accepted position and
I'm not making a counter proposal.

> Hugo has already found his answer, which hopefully is that the rest of
> the xml is not serialized at all.

That's not what I read .. the rest of it goes in the payload of the
POST. Is that not correct?

> Do you have a counter-proposal for terminating the "case element not
> cited" part of the algorithm?

Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 12:20:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:43 UTC