- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:49:56 +0200
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20040723114956.GD14776@w3.org>
* Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> [2004-07-23 12:07+0200] > I remember that we allowed HTTPS in the HTTP binding. The introduction > actually says so. Am I correct? > > However, this is the only place where the term HTTPS appears, so > something is missing. > > Anybody remembers what was decided? Actually, I found the following: Issue 165: HTTPS support Closed 5/20/2004 FTF. Will add http:authenticationType and http:authenticationRealm to endpoint. 0. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165 I would like to confirm my understanding of the issue — the issue about issue 165 —: - rereading Youenn's original email[5], issue 165 seems to be more about basic authentication than about HTTPS; this would explain the resolution recorded, and also the fact that the 2004-05-20 minutes[1] do not mention HTTPS at all except to say that the issue is closed, and that Dave's proposal[2] which was discussed doesn't mention HTTPS either. - HTTPS was supposed to be addressed by looking at the URI scheme; I remember it being like that in an old draft[6], it is mentioned and isn't challenged in Youenn's email[5]; I believe that, because of the reuse of {http location} in the SOAP binding, HTTPS would also be supported by the SOAP binding; my interpretation also seems to be confirmed by a comment made by Jonathan the following day[3]: Jmarsh: Maybe it is about changing the uri scheme on a per operation basis? http and https? I think that it disappeared from the draft by mistake. So I think that we need to do two things: 1. retitle issue 165 to say: HTTPS and Authentication support 2. put back in the draft the handling of HTTPS based on the URI scheme, with some text like in [6]. I am afraid that if we don't do (2), we will have to reopen issue 165. (1) is just to be able to understand what 165 was about. Jonathan, all, does that make sense? If so, I'll put it back in the draft. Regards, Hugo PS: I had a look at HTTPS discussions in the archive[4], and it seems that the 2004-05-20 minutes is the last time the word HTTPS shows up. 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0074.html 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0053.html 3. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0073.html 4. http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=HTTPS&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-ws-desc 5. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0304.html 6. http://www.w3.org/2004/01/21-httpbinding.html#origin -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 23 July 2004 07:50:59 UTC