- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:13:14 +0200
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Message-ID: <20040721111314.GE8794@w3.org>
All, and Dave in particular,
I have found two important issues with regards to the HTTP binding,
but which can both be fixed easily.
First, the HTTP binding doesn't set the {type} property of binding. I
have fixed this already:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings.html?rev=1.44&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-binding-id
Second, I have discovered a fairly big mismatch in the HTTP Binding.
Fortunately, I think it's just an editorial mistake that should be
fixable easily, but involves quite a lot of editing.
The HTTP Syntax Summary shows, among other things:
<binding name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI"
http:methodDefault="xs:string"?
http:cookies="xs:boolean"?
http:version="xs:string"?
http:defaultTransferCoding="xs:string"?
However, Indicating an HTTP Binding shows:
<binding >
<http:binding methodDefault="xs:string"?
cookies="xs:boolean"?
version="xs:string"?
defaultTransferCoding="xs:string"? >
</binding>
which is obviously different.
There is such a mismatch for all the components.
I do believe that the first way (http:PROPERTY attributes) is the way
to go and not the second one (http:COMPONENT elements). It actually
matches what the SOAP binding does:
<binding name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI"
wsoap:protocol="xs:anyURI" >
Does everybody agree before I start making lots of changes in the
Part 3?
Also, as a final comment, http:authenticationType and
http:authenticationRealm go an endpoint and not service per our May
F2F[1]. I will fix this.
1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0074.html
--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2004 07:14:00 UTC