- From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:22:24 -0700
- To: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 15:27:30 UTC
Amelia A Lewis wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:10:04 -0700 >Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com> wrote: > > >>So, the idea is not to restrict/expose how to dispatch. It is to expose >>to the client what the client must do. Dispatching is web service's >>business, exposing the necessary contract is WSDL's. >> >> > >Absolutely agreed. > >So you agree that we don't need a feature on the abstract interface that >indicates how dispatch is accomplished? It is unnecessary to the >contract. > >Amy! > > Come on. Playing with words do not get anywhere here. We do need a MANDATORY extension in WSDL which exposes what the client must to for dispatch. It is necessary for the contract. --umit -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 15:27:30 UTC