RE: Part 1: Editorial Issues

> Looks like someone has done this work

You are correct, Roberto fixed them. See,
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0146.html

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 2:12 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Part 1: Editorial Issues



Hi Asir,

Looks like someone has done this work already .. I can't find any
of these problems in the current draft. Please check and indicate
if I'm confused!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:03 AM
Subject: Part 1: Editorial Issues


> 
> I have few editorial issues,
> 
> (a) [MISSING] Interface Fault component, section 2.3.1, para 3, missing:
> {target namespace} property
> 
> (b) [MISSING] Property component, section 2.8.3, missing: mapping for
> {required} property
> 
> (c) [MISSING] Binding Operation component, section 2.11.1, missing:
> {features} and {properties} properties
> 
> (d) [MISSING] Endpoint component, section 2.14.3, missing: mapping for
> {address}
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 14:16:56 UTC