- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:14:15 -0400
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:17:38 -0400 Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:05:25AM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > <paul.downey@bt.com> writes: > > > > > > same as SOAP "getStockQuote" with an endpoint of > > > mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk <mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk> - i.e. > > > it > > doesn't > > > make much sense. > > > > Not at all! If SOAP/SMTP binding is in use it makes perfect sense to > > say "send a SOAP message to that email address." However, there's no > > GETting or POSTing going on there. > > FWIW, in the abstract, POSTing could be considered to be going on; SMTP > DATA is nearly semantically identical to HTTP POST. True. But mailto: is not an SMTP-specific scheme. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:14:40 UTC