- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:59:03 +0600
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes: > > Finally, the style of discussion that has gotten a bit inappropriate > on this issue. I've been interpreting a specification as the words > are written, not "doing a full-scale violation", nor a "liberal > interpretation". I apologize; I was not trying to be accusative like that .. I intended those statements in a light-hearted sense. However, I can see that they can be interpreted differently; so please accept my apologies and I'll be more formal/careful hereafter (at least on this topic)! > If I've made a mistake, and that's entirely > possible, then point out where in the spec. Particularly, show me > where it says in the SOAP spec that a WSDL binding cannot use 2 > soap request response MEPs that are each correctly use the SOAP > HTTP binding. I'll reply to this and other technical points separately in a little while (gotta wake up a bit more). Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 22:04:57 UTC