- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:15:55 -0400
- To: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:30:04PM -0700, Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > WSDL 2.0 should not require identifying the operation name because doing > so will unnecessarily limit the applicability of WSDL 2.0. Sure, it would limit it to describing well designed, self-descriptive protocols. IMO, that would be a Very Good Thing. Was there a particular protocol you had in mind that you wanted to be able to describe? Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Seeking work on large scale application/data integration projects and/or the enabling infrastructure for same.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 19:15:30 UTC