Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2004-07-08 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:54:12 +0600
To: "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <168d01c464fb$706124c0$84614109@LANKABOOK>

"Umit Yalcinalp" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com> writes:
> 
> Since there are different ways to implement the abstract OperationName
> feature as stated above, this specification requires a unique means of
> identifying the operation name via the Property value. The value MUST
> be the fragment identifier that signifies the specific operation
> engaged and MUST be made available in an interaction. (See Section C.2
> Fragment Identifiers)

I'm afraid I don't understand this paragraph either. What fragment
IDs are you talking about?

Sanjiva.

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 10:54:49 UTC