- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 21:26:07 +0600
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Yep this is indeed an issue. I am going to make a simple proposal for this too .. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: <paul.downey@bt.com> To: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:29 PM Subject: which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding) > On a related note, i did wonder if the wsa:ReplyTo address (or some such) > identifies the endpoint URI, is there an issue in routing the message > back to originating binding or operation? > > i.e. if more than one binding shares the same endpoint URI and/or more > than one operation uses the same response message, it is possible to > publish an ambiguous WSDL. > > i guess this is similar to the "which operation" issue and could benefit > from the same resolution/text. > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: 04 July 2004 17:16 > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Revised Asynch Binding > > [snip]
Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 11:26:49 UTC