RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. from paul.downey@bt.com on 2004-07-01 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:08:51 +0100
To: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <dorchard@bea.com>, <hugo@w3.org>, <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709D9EB@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>

Sanjiva wrote:

> Why not go all the way and recommend people to do what Mark 
> always wanted? Allow/enable/encourage people to name their 
> method GET/PUT etc.:
>
>    <operation name="GET"> .. </operation>

except you can't have more than one operation called "GET" 
in an interface.

Paul

Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 10:08:54 UTC