- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 03:14:25 +0600
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'Amelia A. Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes: > How is the restriction valueless? Pardon my ignorance. I'm ignorant too apparently because I see value in it (as the proposer!). > I think the restriction seems quite valuable. Good! > Out of curiousity, how many "proposals" are out there? I would love to be > able to compare and contrast all the different ones. The ones I know of > are: Arthur's, mine, Amy's, status quo. We are discussing two independent proposals: one about restricting the number of interfaces supported by <service> and another related to R-085. The comment from Amy was related to the interfaces-per-service proposal: she finds my proposal to restrict a service to one interface valueless. I obviously disagree. W.r.t. Arthur's proposal for R-085, I am confused as to where we stand; I see most discussion terminating postively but I could be biased in my interpretation. Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 17:13:54 UTC