- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:16:54 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 Gudge > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: 30 April 2003 12:19 > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > > I would think that we should disallow circular inheritance > like what you indicate. I believe the wording was put into > support "diamond" inheritance where are single interface > inherits the same super interface via two or more inheritance paths. > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> > To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:12 AM > Subject: "recursive" interface inheritance > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > The current editor draft of part 1 spec [1] reads like that > extensions > > can > be layered, but it doesn't say anything about if an interface > can appear multiple times in the inheritance hierarchy, for > example, is it legal for interface A to extend interface B > and C, while B extends A, C extends B, > > and so on? For lack of good terms, I call it "recursive" > inheritance. > > > > We did discuss how to handle operation name conflicts, and added the > following rule: " In cases where, due to a interface > extending one or more other interfaces, two or more interface > operation components have the same value for their {name} and > {target namespace} properties, then the component > > models of those interface operation components MUST be > equivalent (see > 2.15 Equivalence of components)If the interface operation > components are equivalent then they are considered to > collapse into a single component. It is an error if two > interface operation components have the same value for their > > {name} and {target namespace} properties but are not equivalent". > > > > "recursive" inheritance may be considered as a special situation for > operation name conflicts. But I don't think it's the > intention of this group to allow "recursive" inheritance. If > the group agree, It would be helpful to make it explicit in the spec: > > - layered extension should be allowed > > - "recursive" inheritance should be disallowed. > > > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12 > .html#Interfac > e > > > > Best Regards, > > Kevin > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 17:21:59 UTC