- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:05:05 -0700
- To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'Amelia A. Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
How many are there for the restricting # of interfaces? You say "the interface-per-service", but there are at least 2 different ways of doing that. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:14 PM > To: David Orchard; 'Amelia A. Lewis'; 'Arthur Ryman' > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface > > <snip/> > > Out of curiousity, how many "proposals" are out there? I > would love to be > > able to compare and contrast all the different ones. The > ones I know of > > are: Arthur's, mine, Amy's, status quo. > > We are discussing two independent proposals: one about restricting > the number of interfaces supported by <service> and another related > to R-085. The comment from Amy was related to the > interfaces-per-service > proposal: she finds my proposal to restrict a service to one interface > valueless. I obviously disagree. > > W.r.t. Arthur's proposal for R-085, I am confused as to where > we stand; > I see most discussion terminating postively but I could be biased in > my interpretation. > > Sanjiva. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 18:02:44 UTC