- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:13:37 +0100
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1, this is what I think the AF spec[1] was hinting at. SOAP applications would access attachment via the "secondaryPartBag" property and would not have to worry about serialization details. Jean-jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/07/SOAP-AF/aftf-soap-af.html Martin Gudgin wrote: > Personally I'd model attachments using an element decl and figure out > the actual serialization in the binding.
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 09:14:21 UTC