RE: A WSDL media type and the TAG

On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 18:24, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> 
> > > "W3C Working Groups engaged in defining a language SHOULD arrange
> for
> > > the registration of an Internet Media Type (defined in RFC 2046
> > > [RFC2046]) for that language;[...]"
> 
> How do you conclude from this that we don't need to define a media type?
> I reached the opposite conclusion.

This is a TAG finding, not a W3C Recommendation. In any case, as Arthur
and I pointed out, they are reasons to define one.

Philippe

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 10:57:45 UTC