- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 20:40:05 +0100
- To: <Hao.He@thomson.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA80EFE8B6@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
Dear Hao, I will have to disagree with you for the reasons I suggested earlier. The query string at the end of a URL is protocol depended. The simple WS-MetadataExchange specification does not depend on the existence of a particular transport protocol since it only requires SOAP. Furthermore, since it's SOAP-based, you can utilise all those other WS specifications. For example, with WS-Security you can transmit an X509 certificate or Kerberos token together with your GetWSDL request and receive a WSDL document that is customised according to the service-level agreement that you, as a consumer, have with that service. Regards, -- Savas Parastatidis http://savas.parastatidis.name ________________________________ From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hao.He@thomson.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 1:25 AM To: RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com; Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk; www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: Requesting WSDL Files I agree with Roger. In fact, this is the practice we use as well. It is simple and effective. The way we do it is slightly different: one attaches a view=wsdl parameter to the URI. Hao
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 15:40:51 UTC