- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:58:20 -0500
- To: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Again, this isn't something that the WG discussed, so I wouldn't feel comfortable adding it post facto. I think the best solution is for you or Roger to re-send your list and include a "see also" section that lists: the Apache list the RRS feed whatever else At 02:48 PM 2/2/2004 -0500, Paul Denning wrote: >I suggest that David or Hugo create a page in http://www.w3.org that can >point to both lists and the RSS feed. > >They can decide where to put that page (since WSAWG is done), but since >the WS Activity lives on, I think anywhere under >http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ would be a good place. And since the WS >Activity lives on, W3C resources would be available to update it if needed >(which is probably not too often since its just a few links to other >pages, not the summaries themselves). WSCG could decide if an update is >appropriate. Suggestions to update it can be sent to www-ws-arch. > >Then point the WSA appendix to that page (assuming there is time to do it >before it is published as a NOTE). >Creating that page is probably a good idea even if we can't get the link >to it into the WSA doc. > >The page can be updated if we find any other good sources of summarized >WS-* specs. >For example, I like these: > >http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/standards.jsp >http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/understanding/specs/default.aspx >http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/views/webservices/standards.jsp > > >NOTE that the Hyperlinks on the apache wiki [2] simply do a google search, >which may not get you to the associated spec. > >Our list [3] tries to link you directly to the spec. > >The Cover Pages site map [1] has some WS links, but mostly XML and SGML >links. They are not currently grouped under a Web Services heading, but >if you search that page in your browser for "web service" you will find >some. If you follow them, you may find additional WS-related specs. For >example, [4] lists > >[1] http://xml.coverpages.org/siteIndex.html >[2] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WebServicesSpecifications >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Dec/0058.html >[4] http://xml.coverpages.org/async.html > >Paul > >At 12:30 AM 2004-02-02, Ugo Corda wrote: > >>I would link to the Apache list just as another example of attempts to >>keep track of the existing Web services standards (attempts that are >>becoming harder and harder ...). >> >>I don't think we should necessarily endorse the contents of the Apache >>list, given the fact that our group has never systematically analyzed >>its contents. >> >>Ugo >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org] >> > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 7:14 PM >> > To: Ugo Corda >> > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org >> > Subject: Re: Crossreferencing the spec list with Apache's >> > >> > >> > >> > On Feb 1, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Ugo Corda wrote: >> > >> > > These messages seem to imply that our group was not aware of the >> > > Apache list. In fact, we already discussed it last October (see the >> > > "Apache" thread in the October archive). I actually modified the >> > > Apache list at that time, based on that same discussion. >> > > >> > >> > That slipped past me somehow :-) >> > >> > Oh yes, at the time it was portrayed on our list as a WS-splat list, >> > not the same kind of thing as what we were doing. As I recall I was >> > heavily focused on the day job at that point and just didn't follow >> > this carefully and check out the Apache list. Sorry about >> > that ... the >> > logical thing to do would have been to make sure the Apache wiki had >> > everything we knew about, and then we would point to it going >> > forward. >> > Oh well ... >> > >> > Do you think we should ask David to link to the Apache list in the >> > Note, Ugo? >> > >> > > -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 15:58:52 UTC