- From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:13:40 -0400
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Mike, +1 to your tweak. --Katia -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Champion, Mike Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 4:44 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: proposed revision text for sect 1.5.3 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:12 AM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: proposed revision text for sect 1.5.3 > > Basically, +1 to Chris' proposal -- I agree with the rationale and think that the proposal is an improvement. > > <proposed> > 1.5.3 Service Description > The mechanics of the message exchange are documented in a > Web service description (WSD). (See Figure 1.) The WSD is an > extensible machine > processable specification of the message infosets and features that > comprise the Web service's interface and the binding(s) of those > message infosets > and features to the serialization format(s) and transfer or transport > protocol(s) > supported by the Web service's endpoint(s). It also specifies the > set of endpoints that each expose a network addressable binding to a > specific serialization format and transport or transfer > protocol of the > Web service interface to the service functionality implemented by the > provider agent. > </proposed> A couple of points. First, this section 1.5 is the infamous "what is a web service" section, so the definition of WSD should be very narrowly focused on what the minimally necessary degree of description MUST be to be a web service, not what the criteria for a good "web services description language" SHOULD be. So, "extensible" is not really necessary here, although of course WSDL should be extensible. Sorry if that is overly pedantic :-) On the other hand, let's make sure we hit the all basic points of the WSDL conceptual model that we really need -- the formal description of a set of concrete operations, collected into one or more machine-processable interface, bound to a specific network protocol, and associated with an addressable endpoint. Then there's Roger's point about the sentence being awkward ... So, a proposed further tweak: 1.5.3 Service Description The mechanics of the message exchange are documented in a Web service description (WSD). (See Figure 1.) The WSD is a formal specification of a Web service's interface: the operations exposed to external users, an interface definition of the XML infosets of the data that is passed to and from the service, the bindings of the interface onto specific messaging protocols, and the set of "endpoints," i,e. associations of the interface definitions with the network address of an agent that implements the interface.
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 15:11:21 UTC