- From: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
- Date: 22-Sep-2002 22:25:47 EDT
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Here, here. Definitely agreed with Mike. We should get an architecture > document published to any and all interested parties for review. I'm far > more concerned about progress the state of web services than looking for a > review from one particular group. While I'm principally interested in the TAG's review, my suggestion is to use the practices and nomenclature from the field of software architecture, and IMO that's the best way to reach the *BROADEST* possible audience, not just one group. I'm sure you've kept up with the work of the experts in the field over the past 10 years or so, so this should be a simple exercise for you. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 22:27:33 UTC