- From: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
- Date: 22-Sep-2002 22:25:47 EDT
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Cc: mark.baker@sympatico.ca
(acm.org seems to be having mail forwarding troubles, so please CC mark.baker@sympatico.ca) > I get nervous when people say things that imply they want > the TAG to be the Court of Appeals for that process. IMHO that's > antithetical > to the "consensus on means if not ends" idea that is at the heart of > any effective industry consortium. I see this WG as a place for the Web > industry to get together, sort architectural issue out into what we can > agree on and > what we must agree to disagree on, all with the input from the public at > large and the considered advice of the TAG. There ain't no Final Authority > here other than what works in the real world. I'm trying to get past that. I'd hope that the suggestions I present would be judged on their own merits. With that in mind, I think documenting the constraints implicit in the software developed to SOAP 1.1 + WSDL 1.1 is the best way to describe the architecture of the system. So far I've suggested that the existing WSA i <truncated...>
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 22:27:38 UTC